Showing posts with label Woodworkers' Alliance for Rainforest Protection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Woodworkers' Alliance for Rainforest Protection. Show all posts

Early History of FSC-WARP Origins

An odd coincidence (a.k.a. serendipity) happened yesterday.

Shortly after my blog post
"It's Not Easy Being Green" went up I received an email from a fellow blogger by the name of Kim Dodge. Apparently Kim and I share a mutual interest in the work of a conservation organization called the Woodworkers' Alliance for Rainforest Protection (WARP).


Then, last evening I was rummaging through some drawers looking for an unrelated file when I stumbled upon a document I haven't seen in years. Given the coincidental timing of this find I decided to post it here.

The document is titled "Early History of FSC-WARP Origins" and it was written by Errol E. Meidinger. (I tried Google to find this info so I could cut and paste, but without luck. Therefore I have retyped it below).

The FSC has its direct origins in discussions among a group of small-scale North American furniture makers, the Woodworkers Alliance for Rainforest Protection (WARP), who became concerned about the effects of their exotic hardwood use on tropical rainforests in the late 1980s. By 1990 they had concluded that a system was needed for certifying sustainably produced tropical hardwoods, and that it should be established by environmentalists as quickly as possible. The idea of a certification system, presumably run by governmental organizations, had already been proposed to the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), an intergovernmental organization charged with developing national policies for protecting tropical forests. But it had been resisted by some members as possibly a disguised way of boycotting tropical timber, and by others as simply unworkable.

Meanwhile many environmental organizations concluded that the ITTO process had been a failure that would not yield significant improvements in tropical forest management in an acceptable time frame. Thus, they adopted and promoted the WARP proposal for a non-governmental certification scheme.

The World-Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), a major international environmental NGO dedicated to the protection of nature and biological biodiversity, became the primary promoter of forest certification. Together with the MacArthur Foundation, the WWF put significant resources behind the project, resulting in the founding of the FSC in Toronto in 1993. The WWF thus invested in establishing what it hoped would be a distinct, durable institutional framework, after which it continued with its varied activities as a general purpose environmental NGO.




Given how much FSC has grown in size and influence since 1993 I cannot help but be reminded of a famous quote by Margaret Mead, which goes something like this:

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
Read more

It's Not Easy Being Green


I like to think of myself as someone one who is "green" and committed to sustainability. My interest was triggered in the early 1990s by a television program called "Captain Planet", which prompted my son to start asking questions about the wood I was using as a custom furniture maker.

The resulting epiphany inspired me to become an active early supporter of groups such as the Woodworkers' Alliance for Rainforest Protection (WARP), which later played a key role in the formation of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) in 1993.


In 1998 I became one of the first furniture makers in the world to become certified to FSC chain-of-custody standards (Smartwood #SW-COC-000055). Between 2000 and 2004 I served in the Board of FSC Canada in a variety of roles including Treasurer and Chair.


Between 2005 and 2007 I was a technical advisor for the environmental film "The Green Chain" , while also writing a chapter on sustainability for The Furniture Society's book "Focus on Materials".

At home we've driven two generations of Prius hybrids. (In fact, getting the first one required convincing the salesman at the local Toyota dealership that the Prius was, in fact, one of their cars.) We recycle, compost, and use low energy bulbs. We also maintain an organic garden that yields an assortment of Heritage vegetables, which we supplement by supporting local farms. The coffee (which I drink plenty of) is Fair Trade/organic.

All in all it's not a bad tally, but I also know my carbon footprint is still, on average, bigger than most in the world. Therefore, by definition, I really don't fit the stereotype of truly being "green".


Probably my biggest sin in this regard is the fact that I eat red meat. Yep, I'm a sucker for a thick tenderloin steak grilled medium rare, Chicago-style, served with a Pinot Noir. Some will argue that I'm a hypocrite because my meat eating is helping destroy the rainforest, but that'll be covered in a subsequent post.

Why am I saying all this? Because ever since the release of Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth" the world's awareness of the "saving the environment" has gone parabolic. But with this has come more greenwash BS than I could ever hope to shake a stick at.


This transformation has shifted many paradigms, including my own, and I've decided to share my views to show a more balanced perspective.

For starters, are meat eaters destroying the rainforest? You betcha. But so are the vegetarians. This will be covered in the post: "Vegans are Destroying the Rainforest".

Another popular crusade has been to stop global warming by getting away from fossil fuels. Great idea, but the simple solutions put forward by the well intended have ended up creating unanticipated problems. These will be discussed in: "Daryl Hannah and Bio-Diesel are Destroying Rainforests".


These two posts will be followed by another intended to give the big picture/macro-economic view of the real problem. That post will be called "The FRDs of Mass Rainforest Destruction". (You'll laugh when you find out what the FRDs are).


Last but not least, the "Big Green Al" post. Al Gore's net worth has grow from around $1 million in 2000 to the point where he's now on the verge of becoming the world's first green billionaire. All this in just over a decade's time. Yep, Big Al knows "green", but his net worth is just warming up. (Oh, good pun!).

Being "green" is not always what it seems.
Read more